« "Less-than-perfect voices..." | Main | Morning dew #3 »
November 23, 2005
Grateful Dead on archive.org
Yesterday the Grateful Dead's archive was removed from public access at archive.org. From the announcement:
...the Internet Archive has been asked to change how the Grateful Dead concert recordings are being distributed on the Archive site for the time being. The full collection will remain safe in the Archive for preservation purposes. Here is the plan: Audience recordings are available in streaming format (m3u).Soundboard recordings are not available.
The howling has begun, and the sense of entitlement that has always concerned me is in full flower.
Many are quoting the famous Jerry Garcia statement, "Once we're done with it, you can have it," or words to that effect.
I think we need to get a little perspective here.
First of all, when Jerry said that - and he said it more than once, so we know he meant it - tape trading was an important aspect of life in the Deadhead community. It was a one-to-one affair, for the most part, and although there were some social pathologies in evidence, it was largely a manifestation of our love for the music and our desire to enlighten the world and turn our friends on.
That is a far cry from what is happening now. The internet Archive and all the other online distribution sources are high-speed, mass-distribution systems that make the best quality recording available to all who know where to look for them. That is a good thing, of course, culturally - but there is an economic element to this that must be taken into account.
I've read a ton of angry posts in the last 24 hours, from people who are convinced the greedy Grateful Dead are doing this to preserve their champagne-and-Porsche lifestyles. "I've given them thousands of dollars over the years, for tickets and CDs and t-shirts," I read. "How dare they take away my instant access to all their music just so they can make money off it?"
A couple of weeks ago there was another round of layoffs at GDP. A few more people - friends and fellow Deadheads - lost their jobs because GDP isn't making enough money to keep them on board. I heard that one of the casualties of this last downsiziing was Ram Rod, who was a member of the GD road crew from the beginning. I really don't think anyone took lightly the decision to let that brother go.
"They are doing this in order to protect their download business," is another cry I've heard. Well, yeah, and in what universe is that an unreasonable position?
I don't really have a dog in this fight. I have a job on the periphery of the Grateful Dead organization, but I am not privy to their decision-making process and I don't depend on them for my income. I help to promote their official releases by playing them on the radio, obviously, but I also play a lot of unreleased music (and I've gotten some of that unreleased music from archive.org).
I have sympathies on both sides of this issue, but I am also detached enough from it to have a perspective that I hope you'll at least consider.
There's a petition online directed at GDM and promising a boycott. "Now it appears doing the right thing for the fans, has given way to greed."
I think it is worthwhile to ask ourselves if there isn't some greed on the other side of the equation.
update: Another petition
Posted by gans at November 23, 2005 08:51 AM
Trackback Pings
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://mediajunkie.com/jack/pinger.cgi/7046
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Grateful Dead on archive.org:
» The Dead vault via iTunes from Uncle John's blog
The long-rumored digitization and “sale” of the Vault looks like it will finally come true as Apple and the Dead work out the terms of a deal to rlease all of the band’s live performances through the iTunes music store. This, if true,... [Read More]
Tracked on November 24, 2005 11:27 AM
» Bad News for Deadheads from Modulator
In a nutshell, the pioneers of music trading appear to have joined the dinosaurs of the recording industry. Read and weep (there were 2300 shows here yesterday). I've downloaded only a few complete GD shows from the Archive, streamed quite a few more, ... [Read More]
Tracked on November 24, 2005 12:22 PM
» Cowboy Up, Fer Chrissake! from Knockin' On The Golden Door
I think I have gotten maxed out in two short days over the whinging and crying of alleged "Deadheads" over the removal of files from The Archive. I have never heard such a display of mean-spirited, stingy, and downright crybaby... [Read More]
Tracked on November 26, 2005 12:29 PM
Comments
I'm with you. Again. I do think they should leave the auds up there for download, though.
Posted by: Chip at November 23, 2005 10:11 AM
Darn it. You mean I need to be nice to people, be social, talk about shows and actually mix with other people that appreciate the same music and things I do if I want to trade for shows. Damn it, bring back the instantaneous downloads.
Posted by: Ron Tavernier at November 23, 2005 10:28 AM
I started trading tapes in the mid 70's,collected quite a few right up till Jer died.Then i stopped for a few years.My teenage daughter gets a computer and i'm fooling around and came upon etree.VIOLA.That was in 2001 or 2.I was STUNNED to see what had become of the baby.I'm glad its back to the ole days.I just wish i could work this keypad with more than one finger.Be Kind & be wise.
Posted by: Joey Browning at November 23, 2005 10:49 AM
David, Your comments are dead-on. It seems GDM wants to be the sole outlet for internet downloads. I haven't downloaded from them yet and I certainly won't now. Audience recordings should not have been restricted. That was their big mistake here. I signed the petition and I intend to abide by it. GDM has my name, my email address, hell they even have my home address. They may as well remove it all from their database. I will still support GDTS-TOO. I have bought music and other merchandise from them in the past but not again until they amend their policy to allow downloads of audience recordings on the Archive again.
Posted by: Rob Futterman at November 23, 2005 10:51 AM
I'm with you David.
Folks need to realize they have been given a gift, and it is not something that is "owed" to them
Posted by: Tom at November 23, 2005 10:56 AM
I'nm not sure what the deal is w/ audience recordings. I expect there will be explanations and probably some adjustments pretty soon.
Posted by: DG at November 23, 2005 10:56 AM
I agree that they have the right. I'm still filled with sorrow. I think that a lot of the anger is a cover for pain. It was such a joy to have so much access that it really smarts to have it disappear. I will have to learn the trading game.............which I will.
Posted by: Wayne Bonlie at November 23, 2005 11:05 AM
David
You are right on the money with your blog entry regarding the cessation of The Internet Archive e-trading of sbds
The Grateful Dead owe us nothing. They've given me joys and memories only exceeded by my children, my current wife as well as some long-legged beauties along the way :-).
There seems to be an inalienable sense of entitlement among us deadheads and some incredible self-righteouness. Its their property and we have to respect them.
Besides, the GD lent their "vault" to us for 40 years. If we have to give it back, it's still been a win/win for everybody!
Posted by: Jeff Fishman at November 23, 2005 11:15 AM
Why does everyone think that all involved with GDP are wealthy. Considering all the money put into the music, equipment etc, they made good livings, but probably not the wealth of a Mick Jagger or David Bowie. This aside, you forget that the Musicians own the music period. It is their perogative as to what to do.
Secondly, As they age, it probably becomes more and more difficult being on the road. the Vault perhaps will support them in retirement.
Now as for the otherside: allowing taping and trading scene definately introduced new generations to the Grateful Dead, remeber that other superbands of the 60's and 70's are considered "old time acts", yet the Dead continued to attract new fans, and still does.
A good part of their success has to be due to their policies on taping, a very smart business move. The new restictions will most likely cost them fans, both old and new, and certainly cost a huge amount of the good will they've accumulated over the years.
Will this all be the right decision? Only time will tell, but we need to be grateful for the years of free access to the music, for their dedication to getting the music out as unspoiled as possible and for their unwavering dedication for the good and right causes. (How many huge rockers sold out, just take a look).
GDP ownes the vault, they have every right to do with it as they please. I believe threatening to boycott GDP is downright childish, selfish and ungrateful, considering what they've been and what they've meant to us.
Gene Martin
SF
Posted by: Gene Martin at November 23, 2005 11:21 AM
Hi!
David, if the GD organization takes control and offers up downloads of Aud for free. I'll eat all my complaining words.
However, I see a $15 a show download fee on the horizon.
I see no difference between trading CDs and downloading them. Who cares if more people have access and can download them (instead of trading)? I fail to see the difference except that for some reason the organization seems to have a problem with so many people have SBDs. If its not about money, why were the AUD pulled as well?
You keep saying we feel entitled? Shouldn't we (to a point)? As fans as have kept this grassroots type thing going for 40 years (some fans have been around that long anyway). We have pumped millions of dollars into pockets of this organization. Personally I think the GD organization feels entitled to out unquestioned support.
I am always bragging about the difference between the GD and other bands. GD freely allowing the sharing of their music is a huge point I try to make.
Now I can no longer make that point (at least from download perspective).
I have not signed either petition and probably will not sign the first one at all. I feel the second one more states what I feel. Though I will not be asking for anything from GDM this Christmas nor will I being buying anything (at this point at least).
Everyone is entitled to their own opinion here. If the AUD had not been pulled I’d be way less upset and skeptical.
Just my two pennies, which in the whole scheme of the means very little.
Peace
Roger
Posted by: Roger at November 23, 2005 11:23 AM
David, your comments make alot of sense but I think that your perspective is a far cry from that of the average Deadhead out there. I mean come on, you're a guy that has had unparalleled access to the vault for your radio show for a long time now. I'm sure you have and will continue to have access to any Grateful Dead related recording that you could possibly want. Maybe you can remember a time when you hung out at a friend's house dubbing audio cassettes on a boom box, but that sure was a long time ago wasn't it? Can you really relate to the profound sense of loss that is felt by GDP forced removal of access to these remarkable recordings? Of course people are angry, it's like taking a junkie's stash from them. For the average Deadhead, the LMA was more than a goldmine. It evened the playing field, so to speak, and made readily available the pristine sounding recordings that for so long were only accessable by a priveleged few. I feel so lucky now that I have known about it for as long as I have, and was able to download as much as I did. I do wish that I was more dilligent about snagging the 80's and 90's shows that they had up there.
Posted by: Joby at November 23, 2005 11:27 AM
"The news is out , all over town , that you've be seen a messing around "
Once again another chapter is this history book has closed .
"You must leave now take what you need and leave the rest"
Cause its all over know Baby Blue .
It was a good run , all thats left are lots of CD's to listen to, and 100.00 ticket prices to look forward to for a summer tour IF one comes around. Will they remove the right to tape the new shows now as well ?
Posted by: Matt Dermady at November 23, 2005 11:27 AM
I'm saddened to hear that Ram Rod is being laid off (WTF?!? Who has more seniority than him?) and others. I agree, David, that the sense of entitlement can lead to greed. That cuts both ways: demanding fans who howl when the free buffet is closed, as well as business decisions predicated on a constant demand for a product into the future regardless of how consumer relations are handled. Both are unreasonable and untenable. I don't even download, just buy releases, including the 10 CD Beanie Baby Special, but I'm upset at the shortsightedness of this move, pissing off the core audience to benefit, short or long term.
Posted by: John Kelly at November 23, 2005 11:28 AM
This is really sad news and I hope that the GDM organization can release some sort of press release on this soon. The folks at Archive.org have been very conscientious about removing soundboards of shows that have been officially released by the band. Having said this, I know the folks at GDM also get lots of requests to release favorites such as Cornell ’77, but I think that they have balked at the idea because of the costs involved in producing a release like this that may not return their investment knowing that folks can just download it for free.
I also know that GDM has become strictly a business these past few years with most of the motivation towards the bottom-line. This is in fact true of JerryGarcia.com which is run by the Koons family, Unfortunately, these folks had very little involvement with the Dead prior to Jerry’s passing so don’t know first-hand of the generous nature of the Dead family. Also, their involvement with Wolfgang Vault only epitomizes their motivation to gouge the Deadhead community. Wolfgang Vault for those who don’t know is the company that bought out all the old BGP posters (e.g., Fillmore series, etc.) and has exclusive rights to use of these posters/images. They have nothing to do with Bill Graham, his family or the Dead, and employ very questionable business practices. I think the greedy nature of the GDM and other related businesses have created the environment today that lead to this sad decision.
Posted by: RB at November 23, 2005 11:31 AM
We are all sad, but it won't do us any good to waste a lot of time on being mad, too. We can all still trade and talk and share. I really liked that part of the whole deal back when. The hardest part for me is updating a monster of a database of shows that I have(poor me!). David, I bet that the message board at GDH Trading heats up this month, eh? Lots to trade!
Posted by: Rich Johansen at November 23, 2005 11:31 AM
I am "grateful" for access to all the files at archive.org, and disappointed to learn that the best of them are no longer available. I can't join those who take offense at this new policy, however. GDP or GDM doubtless have some profit motive in mind, but it seems to me that the artists' right to control the treatment & distribution of their work is a more compelling reason for the change. Some of the SBDs sound awful, having been copied, mutilated, "edited" etc. for decades by well-meaning collectors. The music may be great, or not, but many recordings are unlistenable in their current state (unless you don't mind tape flips in the middle of jams, truncated songs, weird pitch "corrections," etc.). Some of us might overlook these flaws, but a lot of curious neophytes will be turned-off by a "great show" that's riddled with splices and audio drop-outs. I'd rather buy Dick's Picks and wish more soundboards could be made available through official channels for a reasonable price. Meanwhile, I'll enjoy the couple dozen shows, Aoxomoxoa out-takes and Acid Test curios I snagged while the Archive was giving 'em away!
Posted by: Howie at November 23, 2005 11:32 AM
Just so happens I've been reorganizing my music space and came across all my old tapes and some CD trading envelopes not logged. Surely the second best thing of my relatively small traded collection is the impressions of my fellow humans; the generosity, friendliness and spirit of sharing and dedication to quality that came from that community. ( I have never downloaded shows, I'm on dial -up)
I hope there is a way for the trading world to live on. After the actual shows I think it was the coolest things the GD universe had to offer.
Posted by: Pal Val at November 23, 2005 11:35 AM
People say they spent all this money over the years on tickets, records, posters, t-shirts, etc. and the GD owes them for that.
The tickets bought them entry into a show, which were mostly great as these same people complain about not having access to the shows they now want to download.
The albums and CDs and posters are their property. They own them. They behave, though, as if they were just giving their money to the GD for charitable purposes.
T-shirts are cool. Again, you buy a shirt, you like the design of it, you can keep it for years if you take care of it.
I just don't see what the problem is.
Posted by: softmonkey at November 23, 2005 11:37 AM
Gene Martin said “GDP ownes the vault, they have every right to do with it as they please.”
Actually, Jerry and other band members have said many times that once a show is played, it is theirs (referring to the community). This is a verbal contract and could easily be challenged in court. Certainly, the band has the right to materials (e.g., soundboards) that they may have distributed freely to the public. However, the Dead allowed tapers to freely tape and redistribute live concerts. This included folks who recorded audience tapes as well as those who plugged into the soundboard. So I don’t think it is fair that these soundboards be removed from Archive.org.
Posted by: Rubin at November 23, 2005 11:42 AM
Joby posted:
"I think that your perspective is a far cry from that of the average Deadhead out there."
Of course he's right about that, but I am not arguing from my own self-interest here. I have gotten a lot of music from archive.org that I've played on the radio, and I haven't gotten music from the vault in a very long time. So this affects me, too.
Doesn't change what I think is right.
Posted by: DG at November 23, 2005 11:47 AM
well put David. All of the negativity is absurd, and shows how much "false entitlement" so many "fans" seem to have. It makes me want to buy something from GDP even more, to show they have my support.
Posted by: Dan Keller at November 23, 2005 11:49 AM
I understand why they are doing it. When the latest GD Download series came out (1980 shows), I said to myself, why pay for that one download when I can just go onto archive.org and download 20 other shows just like it. Same with some of great new Dick's Picks. Most of the time, downloading a whole bunch of new shows from archive.org gets rid of my "have to have, order right away" impluse feeling.
Posted by: CJ at November 23, 2005 11:50 AM
Jesus Christ whoever gloms onto a band and gets a job out of it should be happy that job lasts longer than a few years. I'm sorry but I have no sympathy for all the "kewl cats" who made no other living than selling GD merchandise for 30 years. Now all of us fans are supposed to feel sorry for Ram Rod and these guys who only got a damn job because they hung around the scene? You wanna talk about leaches...there you go. Don't come on here and generalize by telling us fans we have a sense of entitlement, then turn around and ask us to feel sorry for a guy who sold T-shirt when he wasn't getting faced at dead shows. The GD scene is beat, and what's left of the band plus the few remaining leaches in their business organization have driven the last nail in the coffin.
Posted by: Poster at November 23, 2005 11:55 AM
I don't get it...We organize a great site that everyone contributed to..no harm..once the $$$ drops down, the site is down..We KNOW GDP is having $$ situations (RAMROD's GONE,wtf?), but don't take away THE MUSIC that is FOR US...seems very very greedy, to take down the SBD's and leave STREAMING AUDs...hmmm BULLSHIT, I DONT CARE WHAT SOME OF YOU SAY...THIS IS A STEP FOR THEM, & THOSE WHO ARE NOT CONCERNED AND SAY "GD owes us NOTHING" well, they DO..we keep them supported for many many years. and this is the REACTION WE GET<<< FUCK THAT SHIT_______ BUT THEY CANNOT TAKE "OUR" MUSIC AWAY !!!!!!
Posted by: Off_The _Bus_2005 at November 23, 2005 12:13 PM
All good points DG.
There is definitely an entitlement issue here. We have all seen how the child reacts when being weened from the teet that they have suckled for years.
My issue is the audience tapes - that is what alienates me...I guess not much from the band at all , just GDM....then again I never really was a fan of GD merchandising.
Smoke em if ya got em.
Posted by: Joshua Livingston at November 23, 2005 12:17 PM
thanks for the post david.and it is sad that some of the so called true fans are bashing GDM for what they have done ,as if they(the fans)owned the music themselves.and thanks for getting back to my e-mail.i just wanted you to know that it's not everyone that feels they were robbed!!!
thank you and and all of the GD family
peace,
jammin'
Posted by: jammin' john at November 23, 2005 12:22 PM
Thanks for the post David, you helped me to put things into perspective. When I first heard the news I was pissed, but you are right, we aren't entitled to the music and we don't own it. We were spoiled by the archive. I've been hearing rumors that this was going to happen for a while, but didn't believe them.
It really would be interesting to hear Jerry's take on mass distribution of their catalog via the internet. Thank goodness for bittorrent and bt.etree.org. I will say that I agree with many others that the auds should still be available for download.
Posted by: Matt at November 23, 2005 12:29 PM
((((Jerry)))) (((GD)))) as ever, changes in the world occurs.. but I found the best way to relieve my stress was thru the music of Jerry and the Band... seeing as this all started out by trades, either by mail or tapers parties... only problem now without the sources that were offered to us is that the music will now be generated to a point of crap (a lil EQ here, normalize there)... the idea of keeping the music as pristine as possible made me feel in a way a guarenteed source of clean unadulterated music... if only this reprimanding of music (I say reprimand because the audience shows are now in "lossy" formats) is because the GDP (what's left) wants to clean up and digitze EVERYTHING then redistribute them (even if there's a fee - cuz they will be clean and plentiful) could possibly justify what I feel is a locking up of (((Jerry))) - thank you for all the music - I hope we can get Jerry back out of the Vault - Ripples in still waters....
Peace and may music filled the air... (and hire RamRod back, he's not supposed to go too far from tree)... nothing left to do but smile smile smile...
Posted by: Wolf at November 23, 2005 12:33 PM
Well said, David. No ifs ands or buts.
Who else not only gave away so much music but began an entire culture that gives us the rest of etree, etc. Granted, Jer and that other DG Mr. Grisman were toting their reel to reels to bluegrass shows before like some other folks but does anyone really think the whole jamband scene would be essentially giving away copies of their shows if it hadn't been for the Dead?
As a very wise singer songwriter says:
"Who killed Uncle John
And kept the show from going on?
"Not I," said the idiot
Flaming on the Internet
"He owed his wealth to guys like me
I take his work so seriously"
"Not I," said the completist
Fondling his compact discs
"I'm sorry that he's gone away
I'll soon own every note he played"
It wasn't me who stopped his heart
I served the man who served his art..."
Posted by: sd at November 23, 2005 12:46 PM
Hi Rob.
You stated that it was a gift. If that is so, then how does one take a gift back? "Indian Giver" comes to mind. I am not fond of that saying but I am not sure what the politically correct version would be. Gift giver and taker backer? Even Judge Judy has said that once it is a gift, one cannot take it back. :-)
Have a nice day and a great Thanksgiving. I'll be giving thanks for the downloads I have been able to accumulate over the last couple of years.
How will this effect downloads on other sites like e-tree? I have not seen many GD shows lately on that site. Very few and far between.
>>>>"Posted by: Rob Futterman at November 23, 2005 10:51 AM
I'm with you David.
Folks need to realize they have been given a gift, and it is not something that is "owed" to them""<<
Posted by: Pistol Pete at November 23, 2005 01:01 PM
Maybe it's time to digitalize the vault if GDM is hard up for $$$...
Posted by: TTB at November 23, 2005 01:29 PM
The end result, no doubt will be for the good. Just what that will be, remains to be seen. Maybe the customer service aspect of the systems in place will improve. Maybe the communication among the community, between merchant and the marching band will improve. No one wants this to be reduced to a shovel and throat delivery system so common in marketing today. Maybe the human to human kindness will return, that was syphoned by the whoosh of broadband connections.
I know one little demon in the box is the habit of hording. I faced this, as I kept 'improving' how I stored them all. Finally, I just started carrying them around, and infecting people with them...after all I still had the shn's.....
There's too much good in this garden to worry about a little weeding. (multiple puns intended)
Posted by: Mark Ogier at November 23, 2005 01:35 PM
I understand GDP's reasons for doing this, but it still saddens me.
Many of the uploads to archive.org involve value added by the same community of rabid audiophile completists who are now complaining about the loss of access.
Often, this would involve tracking down low-gen audience tapes to splice in to fill in cuts on the master tapes. These audience patches are from the taper community, not the vault, and it would be significant rework and duplicate effort by GDP to track them down and do it again (which likely means that it won't happen, given organizational inertia).
Another issue involves the commercial release of the soundboards of shows.
If GDP had concurrently announced that all of the shows from the archive would be immediatly available from a pay-per-download site, at least the shows would be available.
Instead, they've gone into the "unavailable archive of special tapes" that nobody but a select few get to listen to (insert your own partial analogy to 'tape hoarders' here).
A few select shows will trickle out through the official release gates, but many will languish behind vaulted walls, unplayed. Yet, many of those unreleased tapes have forgotten musical moments on them that need only another listening for someone to say "WOW! I forgot how good '84 could be!
If a tape sits in a vault in the forest and never gets played again, will its sound be lost and forgotten?
Posted by: John B at November 23, 2005 01:55 PM
This is from Ed Brown via email, posted here with his permission:
Hi David,
I have enjoyed your radio program over the years and liked your book.
First off, I was not "savvy" enough to know what the archive deal was all about. I traded and obtained the music via the traditional channels (trades etc.)
Please don't let some people (I suspect most who never saw papa play) drag down our whole music scene.
For over 30 years we have had free and unfettered access to what we all felt was the best music ever created in the world. Yes Jerry said we can have it, but you may want to remind the souls who are now complaining, that in those days, the reference was to privately recorded copies for personal distribution within our community. I suspect that papa was satisfied that the jack straw in the audience had paid for his ticket and if it was his trip to record; so be it!! and if he made copies for the other heads, fine so long as no money was involved. Thankfully, the "priacy" was kept to a minimum. Those complaining, don't remember the stories of the deads' lawyers with police busting the shops that sold bootleg records and tapes. Though not a big problem, I remember the small record shop in Greenwich Village on 8th street that one day had no more GD tapes! Still had everyone else, but no more GD or JGB or Bobby & The Midnites etc.
We need to remind everyone that the taped legacy is still the intellectual property of the musicians who made it and their families.
The "family" could claim copyright infringement on all the audience tapes if they want to. I suspect, it is too hard to do, and also a feeling (as always) that those tapes belong to "us" because of the Jack Straw in the audience who took the time to record it himself.
There is so much music available I want to apologise for these people complaining. I mean hey, they are just asking 1 more person to pay. (like a ticket) I know they are not gong to go after people for making copies for friends and newbies to turn on.
Children today have bastardized our model of music distrubution. I applaud the band for trying to keep what is rightfully thiers. They worked so hard to build such a library and now their families can reap the rewards of the legacy. (minimal as it is) Isn't that the American way? To build a business that lasts and pass it on to the kids?
Maybe someone with status within the family should address the issue and nip it in the bud. We dont need the negative vibes.
Maybe Mountain Girl. Jerry's daughters deserve all that is theirs from the business, and she has always seemed to be able to sum up in a nutshell the "deal" when something needed to be addressed to the audience.
Peace always and have a great Thanksgiving!
Ed Brown
Posted by: DG at November 23, 2005 02:09 PM
"Actually, Jerry and other band members have said many times that once a show is played, it is theirs (referring to the community). This is a verbal contract and could easily be challenged in court."
This statement(s) does not come even close to meeting the requirements of a legally-enforceable contract, and you would be laughed out of court. First, the "terms" are too general, I mean it's debatable whether the statement was contemplating taping at all. Also, the "GD community" is too nebulous an entity to be a party to a contract, and if it was, when (and how) did the community accept the contract? Also, there must be a bargained-for-exchange. Where was the bargain, and what did the GD community give up as their part of the exchange? Actually, this doesn't meet ANY of the conditions needed for a contract.
DG has it completely right. I am saddened by the response from the internet community. I've always thought the Dead had the best fans anywhere, and now we look like the biggest bunch of spoiled babies I've ever seen. I feel downright ashamed, quite frankly. You can still get ANY SHOW YOU WANT, FOR FREE. You just have to go to a friend's house or mail it to someone. Is it that difficult???
LDBS showed up in the mail today, so I'm gonna have an absolute blast tonight regardless.
Posted by: Shane at November 23, 2005 02:10 PM
As a music industry professional, I have to say that this is one of the stupidest business decisions ever made.
But, since the Napster decision (which was good, in that it preserved the artists rights to their work), every decision by the music industry has been incredibly short sighted. (As Bowie said "what kind of idiot sues his customers"?)
The one big factor that makes the GD viable in the 21st Century, long after their contemporaries are largely forgotten, is the constant advertisements provided by the brilliant move of allowing free taping and trading.
I haven't the slightest doubt that I could dismantle any arguments to the contrary - from a business perspective - in 5 minutes, but we all know that human beings don't operate logically.
An easy example is the fact that most of the 1969 Fillmore West shows were available to download for free throughout the time that the Box Set was for sale - and it didn't prevent it from selling out. In fact, I'm pretty sure that the vast majority of buyers already had the SBDs and that is how they knew how good those shows are.
That this decision did not come from a reasoned, logical and smart perspective is clear to most of the Deadheads - simply from the fact that AUDs are no longer available to download.
While SBDs come from PA system provided by the band, AUDs come from equipment and resources provided by tapers. Commercial releases are almost never made from AUD tapes, and many bands, including the GD, allow AUD tapes to circulate of the same shows that are commercially released.
So, clearly there are no good reasons for the removal of the AUD downloads, only bad ones.
Comments like "you should be thankful for what you have" or "now you will have to socialize with other Deadheads in order to get music", however true, don't make the decision a good one.
Posted by: A Dude at November 23, 2005 02:13 PM
What a loss for the music lover. Fantastic instant access to a myriad of shows from the whole history of the fabled GD. Personally tried to take advantage of it as much as possible. I have some desert Island shows that I will always treasure. Funny thing about some of shows I love is that they are probably shows that wil never see an "Official" release. Even if they do, lord only knows when that will be. There is a lot of material out there, I am sure there is a point of market satuation, since it is a business I am sure a lot of thought goes into what is released and how popular/monetarily sucessful it will be for return on investment and other sundry business thought. My sense of time and taste might differ from the people that make the choices and well... On the brite side, I guess you can not miss what you do not know.
The access that was provided by the archive into the GD world was great while it lasted. The musical discoveries to be had were imense; fantastic possibilities abounded across 30 years and some 2900 plus shows availible. I am going to sorley miss that kid in the candy store feeling I had when looking at the main achrive page for the GD. Maybe I will go start my own band.
Selah
Posted by: cw wright at November 23, 2005 02:33 PM
DG,
Thanks for the info on the current situation. I too have a better appreciation for GD's prospective. The shows were here and now gone. I am incredibly grateful to have had the chance to explore so many performances. Really changed my life for the better. What makes me feel the worst is the fact that GD gave no warning or explanation. I suppose that's their perogative but it certainly would've been the right thing to do...I'd have understood. Why no one is being up front is crazy. That's certainly not what we're all about in this vast community. My holiday gifts from GDP arrived today and because I can never re-pay the GD for the joyous impact of the music;I'll continue to do business and purchase their music and goods. I truly hope that GD comes clean...maybe THAT is what they owe this community.
Posted by: Jill Baeder at November 23, 2005 02:35 PM
New technologies just helps those who want the music have access. There was high speed tape copying, but WE ALL did not like that because the quality was lower than slower duplication-remember? Now if someone bought a CD, "Dick Picks", wouldn't that be possibly copied or ripped to mp3? So there is no way to truly stop this unless the vault is locked, and wouldn't that be the death of us all? The band should put the entire vault on a site and charge pennies. Not dollars. $16 for a downloaded mp3, that is terrible.
Posted by: Joel Mitchell at November 23, 2005 02:42 PM
"maybe THAT is what they owe this community."
According to some they do not owe us anything, but for some reason we owe them.
Not certain I understand....
Roger
Posted by: roger at November 23, 2005 03:56 PM
I truly believe the music and fan base have been kept alive by the ability to download music.
the MP3 format stinks and most aud tapes sound horrible on my system.I think the success of the 1969 box set woke somebody up..I also believe that without the archive interest may have been lost..why not SACD format or DTS or HDCD ?? I am going to pay for a new mix..keep the dream alive Losing the downloads just plain hurts. No other band has had a run like this why punch us in the stomach
Posted by: mark jaramillo at November 23, 2005 03:59 PM
The GD machine can do as they wish. It is not right but they can. I always figured GDM would put out the shows that are not available. That is whats in the vault. There are hundreds I am sure.
who buys downloads and buys dicks pick's? The same people downloading shows and buying gdm merchandise.
It was the free market supporting GDM and archive.org helped that. They are digging their own grave.
good luck and thanks for the past
Posted by: mike weissman at November 23, 2005 04:01 PM
Well, the Archive was too much of a good thing. I knew they would pull the plug eventually. I never bought in to the "entitlement" thing anyway. I certainly got my money's worth from the Grateful Dead and don't have a problem with paying for the shows I want. BUT - what they are charging now for FLAC's is way too much, considering there are no packaging, manufacturing, or shipping costs involved. I really hope they lower the price somewhat.
Posted by: Mike Perko at November 23, 2005 04:02 PM
They have no money? Is that,.. what the F.... oh wait...never trust a prankster...?!...oh I get it now..Its a prank oh I see! Ok put the shows back up we got it now....Ha ha very funny
Posted by: anthony at November 23, 2005 04:22 PM
I've been thinking about this all day and another thought has occured to me. Most of us have hundreds if not thousands of Dead shows on CD. We'd probably not get to listen to all the shows anyway, but
Now is a good opportunity to start checking out some of the other music which is available and has been available. In the Jazz world alone, there is incredible music going back 80 years, available on CD!. Tens of thousands of CD's
World music, progressive rock from the 70's that was overlooked, Zappa, Miles, Swing Music from the 30's and 40's, Coleman Hawkins, Lester Young, Billy, Ella, Fletcher.
Than we have classical music, Bach, Beethoven, Mozart! etc, there is a reason this music has lasted for so long, classical means classic!
World Music, Music from Latin America, Indian ragas, it's endless!
I admit that the GD were great, yet there is other things to listen to, to appreciate, to explore.
You might not have access to the soundboards anymore, and in all probablility you'll have to buy them, but there is a world of music besides the Grateful Dead!
Ya know, I'd bet that the Band would be the first to tell you that also!.
Gene Martin,
SF
Posted by: Gene Martin at November 23, 2005 05:17 PM
I had just rekindled my love for The Dead last year, much in part to the existence of The Archive. I found much joy in exploring the shows there, some of which I downloaded, some of which I just streamed. I just bought my first Dicks Pick last weekend, and was planning on buying more. I was building a collection of shows, both from The Archive, and from what I would buy on I-Tunes.
It was developing into a joyful and enjoyable hobby for me, and now its gone. I haven't been angry today, just sad. This is one of the things that made The Dead truly unique, now they are as corporate as anyone else, and that's just not right.
Posted by: Ben at November 23, 2005 06:02 PM
David,
I see you have made some comments regarding my opinions on the current situation of Archive.org and GDM’s decisions to release these songs.
I want to start by saying the basis for that petition was derived directly from an email I wrote to GDM. An online friend had basically changed the “I’s” to “We’s” and started the petition. I still stand by what I have said.
Believe it or not, you know me quite well David. We have met many times, we have spoken many times. I’ve been right out at FOH mixing your sets, and I’ve even mixed your monitors at many shows. I listened to your voice on the dead hour for years, and I openly wept when you and Donna Jean played “Sing me back home” at the Gathering of the Vibes this past year. I truly respect you as a deadhead, as a musician, and as a friend. Therefore, I truly respect your opinions.
But I also feel that my opinions are valid, and I hope you will allow me to explain why.
It is important to understand, that to me (like many deadheads), The Grateful Dead are more than just music. It’s more than just concerts, or tapes or SHN files. It’s more than t-shirts, and tattoos, or lyric books.
The Grateful Dead is like an old friend, just as much of a living entity as you and I. Like an old friend that is there when you need them, an old friend that comforts you in the sad times, and dances beside you in the best times. One to provide words of wisdom, and insight, and give you purpose when you have none. This is a friend you trust, a friend you love, and in all honestly a friend you don’t know if you can live without. Just, one of those friends you don’t have to say a word to, and you know all is understood.
Today, I feel this old friend has betrayed me, and it really hurts. No, It’s not about the archive, or the ill treatment or Jerry’s Guitars. It’s not about the overpriced tickets, and separation of band members, or even the poor quality of some of the shows I’ve seen lately. I can forgive mistakes, and poor decisions, god knows I’m guilty of my fair share of those things in this life. It’s more than that. I trusted this friend, and I showed my alliance to this friend for years. We supported each other, we communicated, and we made decisions together.
I remember trading my first analog tapes, living my life in 45 minute intervals flipping tapes to send this music too all my friends. I remember the switch to DAT, then to burnable CD’s. Now it’s various computer files. The media changed, and with every change the timeframe to copy the music shortened. But the rules never changed, no commercial profits were to be made, and we understood that. We abided by the rules, but yet now we are being punished? If new decisions were to be made regarding this 30 year policy, shouldn’t we have been informed? Questioned? Contacted?
But this decision was made, and nobody said a word to us. There was no press release explaining why. There was no questionnaire asking how we felt about it. There was nothing, no communication at all. And this relationship has always been about communication, hasn’t it?
I don’t feel that the Grateful Dead owe me anything. I’m not that pretentious. I don’t expect something for nothing. Like I said, I gladly supported the boys for years. CD’s, DVD’s, posters, Tickets, tickets, tickets! Hell how about my entire wardrobe when I was a teenager?
But decisions are being made that I simply can not stomach. Granted, it’s a sad of affairs when the financial state of the band forces them to let go the personnel foundation they have relied upon for years. I’ve worked in the music industry my whole life, I know how things go. Names like Ramrod, Healy, Pearson, Popick, Cantor and Brightman. These are names of my heroes! I can’t stand the thought of seeing them let go because of the financial state of the band.
But I hardly feel the resolve is to take away something The Grateful Dead promised us was ours long ago.
By releasing this material through Itunes, it is now an official release, is it not? And therefore no longer available for free trade. Is this the case? I don’t know, but it sure seems this way, and there has been no press release to tell us otherwise. To think that I could be jailed or fined for trading a Grateful Dead tape is downright preposterous. Really, of all the “illicit activities” I have participated in at shows, I never thought I would get in trouble for trading a tape ( or in this case an MP3 file)
David, this shits upon the very principals that we believe in. It is the core of what made this whole machine work.
So, what does it really boil down to? Why am I upset?
We don’t ask much as deadheads. Give Lemiux the master recording, take it into the studio, run it through some nice clean preamps and equalize the mix. Make it sound good, and put it on a CD. Throw it in a case with some photos, artwork, and some reviews. We gladly pay thirty bucks for it, just to support the band we love so dearly.
But to take a show off of archive and sell the same (previously free) individual songs on I tunes for 99 cents each, now that I can not support. It feels like a greedy move, especially when there is no explanation behind it, or efforts being made to improve the quality of what was previously available.
This is not only because it's just wrong to take something that has been free for thirty years and then put a price tag on it. But also because I find it morally wrong to pay anything for an eight minute version of fedicule-fedicula. ( c’mon we need a little satire in this elongated emotional explanation.. Feel free to insert your own personal chuckle….. *here* )
But seriously, here are some suggestions for the dead.
• More Dead DVD’s. We love them... We want more
• More Dicks picks. We love them... We want more
• More Vault releases. We love them... We want more
• Get in the studio, record some new songs.
• For God’s sake will somebody PLEASE release an 8.27.72 DVD set already! We have only been waiting 33 years for it. Fuckin’ Slackers. ;)
• Ask us what we want, we will tell you
• Communicate with your fans, we are here because of you. But you are here, because of us. We need each other. Let’s work together.
On a more personal note…
I love what I love and I want it that way. I will always love the Grateful Dead. We just want you to respect your fans, and consider how your decisions affect us. We are all in it together, like it or not.
Posted by: EstimatedProphet at November 23, 2005 06:38 PM
Not a Dead fan at all. Don't own a single recording. Read both sides of the story, the Dead would have been six feet under 20 years ago without the rabid fan base that they are turning their backs on....
I sincerely hope that the hardcore have the gumption to make good on their threats. If it happened to me by my favorite band I'd have to think twice about putting another cent in their pockets.
Hey, I got a great idea! I'd like to get a bunch of Jethro Tull shows. I think I'll put up a server that you can all upload your favorite show onto. Then when I've got them all, I'll pull the plug. Anyone want to join??
Posted by: whocares at November 23, 2005 07:00 PM
It is the Grateful Dead's music, and they do get
to set the rules.
It's just that for close to 40 years, the rules
were clear and consistent. Digital downloading
isn't new, either, and the rules there were
clear and consistent. Don't make any money
off of it, and you're ok.
The rules have now changed. How do we find out?
Not from the Dead, but from a cryptically
worded statement from the Internet Archive.
It's not greed or an overinflated sense of
entitlement to feel a bit betrayed by this.
It's not about the money. I've bought every
recording made by the Grateful Dead, and
some in multiple formats (record, tape,
CD). I've bought tickets and merchandise,
and regret not a single penny I've spent.
I did it not just because I loved the music,
but I loved the philosophy and the ethos.
I loved what the music stood for, and that
it stood apart from the routine commercialism
that was the modern entertainment industry.
It doesn't seem to stand apart anymore.
I'll think twice about the next Dead music
I buy. I'll probably do it, old habits
die hard. But it won't be the same. And
maybe the second or third time, there
just won't be the motivation anymore.
After all, how many Dark Stars can one
truly listen to in ones life, when it's
no longer the embodiment of experimentation
in every sense and is just another piece
of music to buy?
Life is change. The Dead can change the
rules, the philosophy. They deserve every
bit of compensation for the pleasure they
given all of us. I begrudge them, their
staff, their children and heirs none of
it.
They seem to have made a business decision.
And now, suddenly, each purchase will, for
me, be a business decision, too.
That's a loss that saddens me.
- ST
Posted by: ST at November 23, 2005 07:08 PM
I'm really ticked about this. It will be a long time before they see anymore of my cash. Maybe if they got rid of some of their lawyers they could hire RamRod back. This is a sad day in Grateful Dead history. No way I'll pay $16.00 to download a show, maybe 5-6 dollars but that's it. I foresee this decision biting them in the ass.
Posted by: Dan at November 23, 2005 07:21 PM
i know alot of you don't care about this aspect, but is this the way phish is gonna go to. maybe not just them, but everyone. at the prices that music has grown to, how can anyone afford to listen to a wide variety of music? thanks to everyone in the internet music community, i can now listen to various forms of music that i never would have believed, or dreamed, i'd be listening to! i may not have heard of miles, coltrane, scofield, bela fleck, victor wooten, leo kottke, or even fell in love with the stones like i have! i liked the fact that i could compare different versions of dark star, whether it was a shitty aud from '71 to a pristine dsbd reincarnation of th '90s. for what its worth, THANKS to all the tapers, archivists, remasterers, and just plain fans of the music zoo. its been a wild ride!
Posted by: richard tonge jr. at November 23, 2005 07:37 PM
David, first off, I love and respect you and love your show if you happen to read this :) You ask: "In what universe is [protecting one's [business] an unreasonable positon ?"
Well, the answer used to be: The GRATEFUL DEAD UNIVERSE! That was the beauty of the whole thing! The band set a precedent when it allowed taping. Many other bands followed that precedent and it actually spawned a whole culture of taping, trading etc. This latest move seems to be reversing that historic precedent - that's what's disturbing about it.
One of the things that initially made the Dead so appealing to me was the notion that they were not just doing it for the money. They were doing it to promote so-called counterculture values...or so it seemed. As a fan who hasn't had the good fortune of knowing the band members personally, it makes me think that maybe my belief that these guys really were "different" was just a delusion.
GD shows were one of the few things, if not the only thing, in my life that I can honestly say was - no strings attached - FREE. If they will now be for profit, at least they were free longer than air and water.
I agree with a prior poster that it just "feels like a greedy move." Another poster says it's "just the American way." Well, exactly - that's precisely the problem.
I'm grateful for all they've given me but disappointed with the direction of the whole thing and how mainstream it seems to have gone since Jerry died.
Posted by: Ed Olexa at November 23, 2005 10:00 PM
I'm disappointed in the way it went down as much as anything at this point. Someone in the scene found me and turned me on to God (Allah), so a bump in the road won't detour us if the vehicle really is good. GDP should talk more.
But they could have left the comments up, as well as lo-res mp3s up for review, and cut prices a bit on the download series. I'm interested again but got tired of the misses not being expert in show histories, even with 60 or so certainly NOT always great shows.
I still feel bad that Jerry was, in a way, worked to death. I hope the grateful harmonious part of the dead & community is still there somewhere.
Posted by: Rich SF at November 24, 2005 12:45 AM
Go dig up some of your 88 or 89 Greek half time interviews. Dan Healy and Jerry Garcia told you many years ago; that the GRATEFUL DEAD concert library would be on line for sale some day. It was a pipe dream almost 20 years ago and the Download Series is reality now.
The prices are too steep in some cases. The buyer must supply the hardware, disks, cases, and broadband connections; yet the prices are equal to a commercially distributed Dick's Picks package. I bought the 15 original Latvala releases because the man knew what he was doing. We usually don't hear the leftovers any more.
Radio is becoming more of an advertisement for the above products, be it the syndicated Grateful Dead Hour, KLCC and many more. So it doesn't surprise me that you're doing much less on KPFA too.
We already have an official GRATEFUL DEAD internet radio station and www.deadshow.com Leaving the streams of crappy audience tapes on the archive is a waste of bandwith. And these fools believe, that nobody can record that $hit the old fashioned way, using some third party software. Wanna bet.
I use this media player plugin to import analog sources to the hard drive. NERO Burning Rom's wave editor does a nice job of marking the tracks. Another CD is on the way...
Posted by: TR at November 24, 2005 02:10 AM
Thanks David for being one of the voices of reason on this topic.Having read thru many of the disscusions on various boards reguarding the Archive pulling the downloading of the GD " for the time being "
While I can understand pulling the SBD's it does kind of irk me pesonally that all the AUD are gone too. Does anyone remember when the band realized that they couldn't stop the tapeing scene and instituted the taping section? 1983 I do believe,even on occasion offering a patch into the soundboard.
Yes I still have most of my old tapes most of which I also recorded and trade either in person or by snail mail.
So what's the beef all the music is still out there "you just gotta poke sround"
Understandably most are upset over the fact that one day it was there on the Archive and "poof" now it's not as freely available.
Yet I do agree that the Band does need to protect their download business but at what cost to the community as a whole...for without the community what business do you have?
Posted by: Steve Pitrowski at November 24, 2005 02:22 AM
You SHOULD be thankful for what you have, and not throw a hissy fit just because someone made your life a little less easy. I was working my way through the 1978 shows, up until yesterday, and at first I was unhappy with the decision, but when you sit down and do a little math, it would be difficult to listen to 13 years of concerts let alone 30+. I have a good idea most of the people posting here have more shows than they could possibly listen to, unless your job (DG) is to listen to music all day long.
I get paid to listen, my boss just doesn't know it. =]:0)
Posted by: Marshall at November 24, 2005 03:04 AM
I certainly agree that the band is entitled to profit from the music and the soundboards they made. But my view is with ADude, that restricting access to decent recordings is not the best way to do it, in fact it is the worst way to do it.
The declining cashflow and layoffs have led to a crisis in GDP. They perceived the easily downloadable soundboards as part of the problem, and now have yanked them. But I doubt that this will solve the problem. Much as we hate to admit it, the Dead have been gone ten years, and the Heads who followed the Dead around are a finite, aging, shrinking group. I've been around a few scenes where basically the heyday was in the past (folkdancing, dying language communities). The only way to revitalization is to bring new, younger people in. It's very difficult. Yet the internet allows not just friends of Heads but everyone to learn about what made the Dead so special - for a small price (access, equipment). It's probably the best chance to avoid what is otherwise the inevitable decline in numbers of the Dead community, and therefore a continuing decline in revenue for GDP.
I would hate to see such a beautiful thing fade away.
Posted by: Bill Croft at November 24, 2005 04:36 AM
GDP owes me nothing and i don't expect to be given anything for free, but when i am i appreciate it. Takin away SBD's is fine with me but why mess with AUD tapes. Next time it rains on them i hope they take it as Jerry pissing on em.
Posted by: chris at November 24, 2005 05:39 AM
Up until reading this thread, and especially David's comments, I was irritated and resentful, in a reflexive way. Upon reflection, a few things changed my take: (1) The plain truth is that I purchased less from GDP since Archives came on the scene (although I would assume that I have paid much more than your average dead head over the years, gladly so), and (2) I think it is legitimate for creative, well-intentioned people of good will at GDP to make a living and thrive (and expand and hire people). To do so, they have no other option than to incentivize and motivate people like me to pay for the remastered and neatly packaged shows. I am cool with that. After all, I have an embarrassing number of free shows as is (I suspect that if I listened to all them at about an hour a day clip it would take me at least a year and a half, and by the time I got back to the first show it would all be very, very fresh again). And, I know I will be paying closer attention to announcements from GDP and spending money gladly on new treats. The thing that impacted me the most is that people have lost their jobs as a result of low sales at GDP. I don't want to be even a small part of that. In the spirit of thanksgiving, I want to say thank you to anyone who ever had (or continues to have) anything to do with creating, showing, taping, editing, mastering, storing, copying, advertising, distributing, and reviewing (pro bono or commercially) the music that I continue to enjoy and cherish more than any other 35 years after the first note heard.
Peace,
Brett
Posted by: Brett at November 24, 2005 08:20 AM
Every show that was on the archive was downloaded by someone. Someone who is a part of a community called the deadheads. These shows are all out there, you just have to trade for them. Go to a show, meet people, talk, spread ideas, trade discs instead of tapes. It is not so rough. Not so rough at all. I blame this outcry, not on the dead or it's heirs and assigns, but on the kind of pot going around. When pot was a lot less potent we would smoke and smoke and still be able to communicate with other deadheads, other humans, and even police officers. We even told jokes and voted. We would gather for days in some ratty apartment and copy cassettes. Many of us met spouses at these gatherings. It was fun, beer flowed. That has now turned into a rather unsightly scenario of a single deadhead alone after midnite, downloading a show while smoking very strong pot that makes him unable to communicate with anyone. Even the dog has run away in fear of another misguided sexual episode. The deadhead becomes fat, detached from any community, he forgets to vote. Cretins step in and take advantage. Nations are invaded. Natural disasters are ignored. Civil rights are removed. Global Warming! Global Warming! Protests are scheduled, but turnout is embarrasingly small. There is no community to call on. No thread holding people together. A once great nation becomes easy prey for opportunists and texans.And worst of all lovely women stand alone seeking a cool guy with a nice tape to listen to on a rainy car ride through the mountains. Maybe it is time to put the bong down, stop complaining that you cannot have everything right now for free, and look around you. PS Anyone who thinks Ramrod was a hanger on is an ass. There would have been no Dead without a core group of people to make amazing things happen in lousy rooms with poor electricity and in the pouring rain. You try putting on a show bong boy! I will buy the downloads.
Posted by: Doug at November 24, 2005 09:10 AM
Possibly all who make a living playing their songs owes the some bucks too??
Posted by: Rich at November 24, 2005 10:22 AM
i will say the same thing here as i posted at the archive...
I have a ticket to an upcoming phil and friends show, guess what? not going anymore. And I was really looking foward to it as this would be my first dead related concert in a few years. Now, I just cant be around that crap. I have also been meaning to buy one of the new box sets with the remastered studio albums. I have bought SEVERAL DVD's over the past 2-3 years. I WOULD buy some of the downloads but at the price of $30 you guys can forget about that ever happening. SO, with all the dicks picks, buying studio albums for the second, third times (remastered sacd stuff), $75 concert tickets, merchandise (t-shirts, stickers, etc.), DVD's (winterland, the grateful dead movie, vault series, etc. etc), WHAT ELSE DO YOU WANT FROM US!! DAMN!!! People spend more money on you than ANY other band. WTF!!!! The Grateful Dead is a band people listen to their whole lives, and there are reasons for this. This action has scarred the 'grateful dead' as everyone knows and i'm going to suspect that the grateful dead is going to lose those loyal fans that believed in them.
Posted by: fires at November 24, 2005 10:28 AM
I also want to say that as far as the music industry goes; in the 60's the grateful dead took the music industry 10 steps in the right direction post beatles and stones era, now they have thrown in at all down drain and have taken 100 steps BACK. What they did created the whole 'jam band' market where bands can make their name and living off of live performances (which your have to pay to see dont you?). too bad in this buisness they dont get money/credit for doing that besides being the band that people listen to their entire lives and remain loyal and buy new stuff they put out. the work they did in the music industry is PRICELESS. They are doing alot more damage here than what is on the surface.
Posted by: fires at November 24, 2005 10:44 AM
Man........if i do a ctrl-f on the word "entitlement" here, it takes forever to get to the bottom of this document........
Not that anyone is really gonna make any kind of claim to legal entitlement to all that music, (other than those who legally obtained it via the Dead's original policies regarding recording and trading) nor allow themselves to eternally suffer over its removal, but I certainly would say that anyone who feels "jipped" or seriously let down regarding all this has the right to feel so and without having to feel like they are some "cry baby" or something.
Anyone who has almost unlimited and ongoing access to something very cool and enjoyable would NATURALLY feel all those feelings if someone were to suddenly take it away. To take it away like that is just coldhearted AFTER HAVING ALLOWED IT TO BE AVAILBLE FOR SOOOOO LOOOONG! If they hadn't allowed it in the first place, no big, but in these circumstances, it's ridiculous.
I think the vast majority of people don't have the time nor the inclination to trade tapes or whatever, so all this "stop crying and get back to the old days when one inch of GD tape was coveted more than bread itself" crap rings hollow and pretentious. God bless the people who did the taping and lived that philosophy. They stoked the flames of Dead-enthusiasm and then, as it seems to me based on the *.txt files provided with every show, they continued to stoke those flames, co-mingling it with an enthusiasm for digital technology. They didn't hoard it and didn't take the approach that if taping/trading/digitizing wasn't your hobby, you weren't worth the tape the music was recorded on. It seems to me that they freely gave. That's a good example for us all - charity coupled with passion. They are the ultimate producers and promoters of 2 great things in our society. If it wasn't for them, not only would I not have a couple dozen great old Dead shows, but I probably wouldn't have had a clue what Shorten and FLAC were all about.
I just hope that whatever profits are realized on the sale of the future official downloads are only used charitably for some good causes. I don't believe this is about keeping 2 or 3 people employed, so I sure hope it's about feeding and clothing needy people.
Anyway, that's my opinion, and I'm ENTITLED to it.
Posted by: Saint of Circumstance at November 24, 2005 01:09 PM
Sure there is some greed on this side of the equation. Archive.org spoiled us by offering great sounding shows, available 24/365. But how does cutting off access to these shows improve the financial position of GDP/GDM? Anyone who's seen "Roger and Me" knows that layoffs have never done anything to improve the financial position of a company in trouble.
And as bad as I feel about RamRod, it was hardly the job of the fans to keep his ass employed. Maybe if the Dead had hired a new lead guitarist and kept on touring, this wouldn't have been a problem. Grateful Dead/The Dead have stopped touring. How is that our fault? Honestly, how can any employee of GDP - even someone as beloved as RamRod - expect to remain employed as a roadie, ten years after the Dead stopped touring?
If you're REALLY going to open the vault and digitize it, more power to you. But at least tell us what your plan is and PLEASE follow the livephish.com model, whereby you never actually plan on making any real money and instead try to raise some cash for Rex Foundation or whatever cause/org GDM determines is worthy. And give discounts for whole tours/multiple shows purchased. Be reasonable, or I think I speak for everyone when I say, it's over. You've lost this battle and pissed off many of the people who love you the most.
More importantly than anything else, at least give us access back to the AUD tapes. You don't own these and in fact owe your success in large part to the Oades and Millers, etc. who gave enough of a care to record them and make them sound their very best. While I agree that the faceless distribution of archive.org is not ideal, deadheads can and do build powerful relationships over the web. Please let us continue to so, while spreading the music we so love. Thanks.
Posted by: Bill Love IV at November 24, 2005 05:38 PM
I got one thing to say to the GDP and vault keepers:
Bring It On!
especially the 60s
You've sat on it this music way too long
Posted by: Jeff at November 24, 2005 07:26 PM
Hi David,
As you know more than most, we are all an interconnected family that stretches in both directions for 4 decades. But now I find myself sitting in front of a once open door at the family home and wondering why it was closed and locked. It hurts to be shut out so suddenly with no explanation.
If the band is in financial trouble, they should tell us. I would gladly halt all comp CDs sent to the magazine and buy them instead if it would help. We've done so with other bands. And I think we all would do what we could to help. It's what a family does.
So we will keep our petition online as a plea to the band to treat us as the family we all once were and can be again. And we will also continue to support the Grateful Dead in thanks for the loving memories while we wait for an answer as to why this door has closed.
Peace and Light to All,
Dave Terpeny
Editor
KyndMusic.com
Posted by: KyndMusic at November 24, 2005 09:22 PM
I agree with alot of the points made here. I must say though, i was always surprised to the grateful dead on the archive since they are such a big band and you know it would get out of hand quick. the first time i saw it there were about 2,000+ dead shows or so. and that is totally putting them in financial jeopardy?????? we unintentionally took advantage of this great policy that started years ago. however, what is the deal with removing the guitar tab/chord sites? are those owned by warner now too?? thats some bullshit. the music industry is getting more and more corrupt. and you know its this corrupt when all of these light shedding musicians are doing stuff like this. final word about this here, please make the pay downloads a reasonable price for crying out loud! especially those 60's recordings. clean them up and make them sound really nice and charge no more than $10 a show for all formats and quality levels. however if this is decided by warner, it's hopeless.
Posted by: fires at November 24, 2005 11:55 PM
I dunno but I was underwhelmed by the Sbds I listened to over at Archive.org. Alot of times the mix sucked with bobby in the foreground (not that there's anything wrong with it) or the drums dominating the mix. I'd pay for anything that was clean & balanced but I won't pay $16 for mp3's...
Posted by: Glenn_Ochs at November 25, 2005 07:56 AM
I really think this new policy change reflects the greedy nature of GDM. Like many here who have been to hundreds of shows with the boys, it is hard to believe how things have evolved over the past 10 years. I think the Deadhead community would like to continue supporting the organization, however, it is a two-way street in which both sides need respect for each other. I don’t see this anymore.
For example, consider the pricing of their live downloads compared to other similar bands that many of us listen to:
String Cheese Incident:
MP3- $9.95 (128)
FLAC - $14.95
Phish:
MP3 - $9.95 (128)
FLAC - $12.95
Grateful Dead:
MP3 - $15.99 (128)
MP3 - $16.75 (256)
FLAC - $19.90
These are average prices so some may be more/less based on the duration of the show, however, I think it is evident that the Dead charge significantly higher than the others for a show. A lot of folks feel that GDM is now taking advantage of the us the community with these ridiculous prices. I think it will take a lot for them to regain our respect.
Posted by: Randy at November 25, 2005 03:35 PM
This has probably already been said.......or maybe it's too obvious....but the whole thing about listening to shows online, or in the car, or at home.....it's all about the vibe....it's about making a connection, being there, reliving the memories affiliated with the feeling of being at a show.....it's transporting. And in this era of ever increasing restrictions, this statement feels, honestly, more like a Bobby move and really out of synch with what Jerry would have wanted.......after a while.....they (the Dead, formerly Grateful) should just let it go......they had their ride, it's over......now give it away. You can't box it up and sell it......if they do......it's no longer them.....it's become something else.
Peace.
Posted by: stephen at November 25, 2005 08:18 PM
David - I pretty much see it the same as you. For my money, I do not see that this has changed the attitude of free and unfettered trading of music. They have a right, as do all of us, to make a profit from their hard work. I did not, and will not, sign what I believe to be a mean-spirited petition. I went to many shows, and always liked the atmosphere of brotherhood. I am saddened by many of the comments about this.
http://knockinonthegoldendoor.mu.nu/archives/135245.php
Posted by: Mark at November 26, 2005 09:12 AM
David- While i understand that the Grateful Dead business organization has certain financial obligations to it's employees, bottom line, etc.,
one of the primary links between the band and their community,the "unbroken chain",is the free exchange of their music. Not pirate recordings of official releases, but tapes made,with the permission of the band,using the tapers own equipment.Once the permission was given to make and trade those recordings,i find it rather hypocritical to recind that "gentlemans agreement"just because times are tough.That was one of the things that made me admire Jerry's later work;he seemed to be a troubled, broken man that was still graceful and giving in defeat.It gave me hope.These latest developments do not.
Posted by: Philip at November 26, 2005 02:07 PM
As far as I know, the only thing that has changed is that the massive, free, high-speed online distribution scheme has been discontinued. Trading seems to be thriving all ovverthe place otherwise.
Posted by: DG at November 26, 2005 02:49 PM